Ionic Air Purifier ? Lack of Scientific Peer Reviews

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Millions of dollars change hands every year in the ionic air purifier industry. An essential tool to improve indoor air quality, the ionic air purifier inactivates airborne microscopic viral and bacterial organisms, animate and inanimate allergens, gaseous chemicals and possibly radioactive radon.
Unofficial Endorsement
Manufacturers in the ionic air purifier industry pour millions into R&D to prove their claims. Institutes and universities are tasked to conduct multi-faceted studies. Well-known virologists and air quality experts are commissioned to conduct various experiments to verify manufacturers? claims.
Yet other manufacturers of the ionic air purifier look to non-profit third parties with interests in promoting indoor air quality. Various attestations are sought after from non-profit organizations like the American Lung Association, the Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America, the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) and the Asthma Society of Canada.�
User organizations like the Parent Tested Parent Approved Media may also provide some measure of attestation, as the manufacturer of an air purifier demonstrates. It is only a matter of time before manufacturers of the ionic air purifier follow suit.
Official Endorsement Lacking
Despite all the efforts by the ionic air purifier industry, why do we not find any official endorsement? Authorities are mindful of the dangers of polluted indoor air quality. In fact the US EPA officially states that indoor pollution may be 2 to 5 times worse than ambient air pollution. It also says that we spend 90% of our time indoors. Yet, why do they not endorse the ionic air purifier as an essential tool? This question was posed to the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
Scientific peer review, or rather the absence of, was the response. Fortunately, the authorities have not written of the ionic air purifier industry. �Click on our Ezine Article via the widget on the right to:
read what the NIOSH said about the stringent requirements for a scientific peer review; and
find out how the NIOSH will provide funding for a scientific peer review.
The ionic air purifier industry should capitalize on this great opportunity. It may take only one successful scientific peer review to lead the pack!
What Can Consumers Do?
As it is, things are not ideal. What can users of the ionic air purifier do? Do systematic and thorough homework. That?s where our Ionic Air Purifier Review ? 4 Key Factors Model is relevant. It is especially encouraging that for a scientific peer review to be accepted by any authority, it will have to cover the 2 safety aspects in our model. For NIOSH said:
??a scientifically valid study would need to be designed to test whether ion generators are effective in killing viruses to the extent that a hazard no longer remains, and that such technology does not by itself generate new hazards of its own, e.g., ozone or oxidized by-products. The design of such a study would be challenging.?�
Sign up at the Ionic Air Purifier Blog to follow our research.
Technorati Tags: Air Purifier, air purifiers, Ionic Air Purifier, ionic air purifiers, scientific peer review










Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feedsaustin air purifier hepa air purifier hepa purifier